Archive | January, 2009

Carefully Choose Your Verb

In my posi­tion as a gifted sup­port teacher, I have the oppor­tu­nity each day to work with reg­u­lar edu­ca­tion stu­dents and their teach­ers. Last week, I had the plea­sure and priv­i­lege of join­ing a first grade class, taught by a won­der­ful, tal­ented young teacher. (I can say that now that I’m no longer in the “young” cat­e­gory.) It isn’t often that I get to work with pri­mary grade stu­dents, and my expe­ri­ence in that class­room got me think­ing about the way we do things in school and about the verbs we use to describe it.

Dur­ing our les­son last Fri­day, we were doing a sci­ence exper­i­ment. The stu­dents have been learn­ing about rocks, and the inves­ti­ga­tion that day was called “Wash­ing Rocks.” Sounds like a yawn-​​fest if ever there was one, even to me, a sci­ence geek.

But when the stu­dents heard we were going to do sci­ence, there was such obvi­ous joy and excite­ment in the room. The teacher, Miss Hill, briefly reviewed what the stu­dents had done the pre­vi­ous day, then announced (with what I have learned is typ­i­cal first-​​grade-​​teacher enthu­si­asm) that today they would get to wash their rocks! One lit­tle girl in the room was so full of glee at this announce­ment she couldn’t con­tain her­self. She cheered, “Yay!” and clapped her hands as only a six-​​year-​​old child can. This was a rev­e­la­tion to me: she couldn’t wait to learn some­thing, but even more impor­tant, she walked into every expe­ri­ence, no mat­ter how small, with the expec­ta­tion that she would learn.

Through­out the half-​​hour expe­ri­ence that fol­lowed, while the stu­dents were dip­ping their rocks into cups of water and watch­ing what hap­pened as a result, there was an intense buzz and energy in the room. Every sin­gle child was engaged in the process, every one had per­cep­tive obser­va­tions, and every one was hav­ing his or her world expanded at least a little.

Those stu­dents were learn­ing, and more than just what hap­pens when a rock gets wet. In a half hour, they learned about how to look closely at some­thing and see the details; they learned how to share, both mate­ri­als and respon­si­bil­i­ties; they learned that some­times you make a mess…and then how to clean it up; they learned how to com­mu­ni­cate an idea with some­one else; they learned the power of a shared expe­ri­ence; and they learned that learn­ing is exciting.

Too often we spend our time in school doing the wrong verb. So much of school is about edu­cat­ing instead of learn­ing, and the dif­fer­ences are vast. Stu­dents learn, but teach­ers edu­cate. I look at a room full of first graders and I see chil­dren who are thirsty for knowl­edge and understanding.

I fear that the response of many edu­ca­tors to that thirst is to pour a bucket of water on their heads. The results are about as effec­tive, too. After years of telling teach­ers they need a drink and get­ting doused instead, I think our stu­dents become soggy and cold and uncom­fort­able. It’s no won­der that when I visit many fourth or fifth grade class­rooms, I see stu­dents who sim­ply want to get through the day. They’ve learned how the game is played: edu­ca­tion is going to hap­pen to them regard­less, and it makes lit­tle dif­fer­ence whether they bother to learn. When they ask why they need to learn it, or whether they may learn some­thing they’re inter­ested in, or how it con­nects to their real world, we just edu­cate them harder or slower or louder or faster, pour­ing on more water. We quench the fire instead of the thirst.

I for one am begin­ning to choose my verbs more care­fully. I want to focus on learn­ing, not edu­cat­ing. I want to engage stu­dents, not deliver instruc­tion. I want to dis­cover, not cover. What other verbs do you need to use more wisely?

The Harsh Reality of School Assemblies

This morn­ing I read an arti­cle that, among other things, made me reflect on school assem­blies and their rela­tion­ship not just to the cur­ricu­lum but also to the cul­ture and the envi­ron­ment around them.

In my school, assem­blies typ­i­cally revolve around cul­tural enrich­ment, expos­ing stu­dents to expe­ri­ences they wouldn’t oth­er­wise be able to have, cel­e­brat­ing stu­dent achieve­ments, char­ac­ter build­ing, how to pre­vent bul­ly­ing, and such.

The stu­dents at a mid­dle school in the Gaza strip yes­ter­day had &th&emc=th" target="_blank">an assem­bly about how to han­dle mor­tar shells and other dan­ger­ous mate­ri­als if they find them lying about. One of  the Eng­lish teach­ers at the school com­mented about the assem­bly: “They are not ready to learn yet. And I am not ready to teach.”

I think some­times, in our drive to com­plete the book and cover all the con­tent before the state test begins so that our school once again can be deemed ade­quate, we can lose sight of the fact that we may have stu­dents sit­ting in front of us who are not ready to learn. And some­times we are not ready to teach. I real­ize that my real­i­ties and those of my stu­dents are not nearly as harsh as many oth­ers’ around the world. But they are still real, and they can still affect learn­ing. The only way instruc­tion can pos­si­bly be effec­tive is if we deal with those imped­i­ments to learn­ing before we get to the pre­scribed content.

Inaugural Words: A Snapshot of History

The New York Times this week­end posted a fas­ci­nat­ing inter­ac­tive fea­ture at their web site: Inau­gural Words — 1789 to the Present. (Thanks, by the way, to Angela Maiers for point­ing me to this, via Larry Ferlazo’s blog.) The site gives a word cloud based on the inau­gu­ra­tion speeches of each president.

Here are a few ideas about how you could use this with your gifted students:

  • Select one of the speeches and have the stu­dents infer what­ever they can about the his­tor­i­cal con­text in which it was given.
  • Research the his­tor­i­cal period and compare/​contrast what was men­tioned in the speech with things that were left out.
  • Com­pare how vocab­u­lary has changed over time. Fig­ure out a way to illus­trate these changes (per­haps with a graph or timeline).
  • Com­bine the text from sev­eral speeches (per­haps all the speeches over a 50-​​year span, or all the speeches from the top-​​ranked Pres­i­dents) and cre­ate a Wor­dle to look for broader pat­terns of words.
  • Cre­ate a Wor­dle from Pres­i­dent Obama’s speech and com­pare it to those from other Pres­i­dents. (Thanks to Lee Kol­bert for this idea.)
  • Imag­ine you’re elected Pres­i­dent. Which other Pres­i­dents would you emu­late? Use words from their speeches to begin build­ing your own.
  • Research which Pres­i­dents wrote their own speeches and which used speech­writ­ers. Is there any dif­fer­ence in the vocabulary?

This is admit­tedly a very rough list of ideas, and none of these are fully fleshed-​​out lessons. What other thoughts do you have?

Dinner Table Differentiation

My youngest son has some very spe­cific food preferences—think “Mikey” from the old Life cereal com­mer­cials. Mean­ing that most of the time, when we sit down at the din­ner table, the first words out of his mouth are, “I don’t like that.” My wife and I have slightly dif­fer­ent views on how to han­dle this. Often, she will make some­thing spe­cial for him just so that he’ll eat. That’s what moms do, espe­cially an Ital­ian one. My view more often than not is that he’s just being overly picky and he can eat what we put in front of him.

Now before you start writ­ing your com­ment chastis­ing me for being a cruel dad, most of the time when we insist he taste what we’ve made, he likes it and will eat it. And he has yet to go to bed hun­gry. So my wife and I actu­ally bal­ance each other nicely. Don’t tell her I said that, though.

My atti­tude towards my son’s eat­ing habits would change, though, if it were a mat­ter of health and nutri­tion rather than pref­er­ence. If he had a con­di­tion that required a spe­cific diet, I would go out of my way to pro­vide it, even going so far as to cook spe­cial meals for him. I would give him sup­ple­ments to replace defi­cien­cies in his body and keep the nutri­ents at opti­mum levels.

We tend to treat edu­ca­tion like nutri­tion. The reg­u­lar cur­ricu­lum is designed around the rec­om­mended daily allowance of read­ing, math, sci­ence and social stud­ies. The con­tent is nutri­tion, and we pro­vide the amounts that are needed to keep children’s brains grow­ing and learn­ing. Some stu­dents have defi­cien­cies, and we spend extra time, effort, and money to cus­tomize their diets to bring them back to opti­mal health.

But what about the gifted stu­dents? I fear that many peo­ple look at them in the same way as the child who likes to eat a lot. We’re wor­ried that if they eat too much, they’ll get fat, so we care­fully reg­u­late their diets, keep­ing them to the rec­om­mended amounts, mak­ing sure they don’t go over­board. It’s the same thing my wife and I do when our kids equate being bored with being hun­gry. Instead of giv­ing them snacks every half hour, we redi­rect them and give them some­thing else to keep them occupied.

But this model is wrong. Instead of look­ing at gifted kids as overeaters, we need to real­ize that they actu­ally have an entirely dif­fer­ent kind of metab­o­lism. They con­sume more not just out of pref­er­ence but out of neces­sity. They have a con­di­tion that requires much higher amounts of com­plex and dif­fer­ent nutri­ents just to stay healthy. But when they balk at eat­ing the same diet we’re giv­ing to the rest of the fam­ily, we tend to see them as whiny brats and respond just as I do to my youngest son: “It’s good for you. Just eat it. And if you clean your plate, then you can have dessert.”

It’s not a mat­ter of keep­ing their appetites under con­trol. It’s rec­og­niz­ing that their nutri­tional needs are com­pletely dif­fer­ent than ours. The learn­ing they crave isn’t dessert, and forc­ing them to eat the meal first doesn’t keep them healthy. With­hold­ing the chal­leng­ing con­tent, or keep­ing it care­fully con­trolled, or ignor­ing the mes­sages they give us about what they want and need isn’t actu­ally pre­vent­ing obe­sity, it’s malnutrition.

Things That Matter to My Students

After writ­ing about 1000 Things That Mat­ter and describ­ing how I would use it with my stu­dents, I spent the week doing that activ­ity with sev­eral groups in the three ele­men­tary schools where I work.

The results were fas­ci­nat­ing. In every group, the stu­dents were thor­oughly engaged and per­son­ally invested. Their analy­sis of the com­ments already posted at the site was par­tic­u­larly inter­est­ing. Though there were some slight dif­fer­ences in the vocab­u­lary they used to describe it, they con­sis­tently iden­ti­fied the same themes recur­ring in most of the comments:

  • Love
  • Joy
  • Peace
  • Rela­tion­ships

It was also inter­est­ing to notice that the stu­dents’ own thoughts about what mat­ters to them tended to fall into these same themes, with fam­ily being by far the most com­monly men­tioned idea.

I think what I found most excit­ing about this was see­ing the kids debat­ing the rel­a­tive worth of all of the things dif­fer­ent peo­ple thought were impor­tant. Their insights were rather mature, actu­ally. When I first planned this, I was con­cerned that the stu­dents might not take it seri­ously. But they did, and when I closed the class period by rec­om­mend­ing they have the same con­ver­sa­tion with their par­ents, they seemed eager to do so.

The power of this activ­ity came from the way the stu­dents could read­ily access opin­ions of peo­ple from around the world. What I would really love to do is take this even deeper by shar­ing their work with other stu­dents in other schools. If you have used the 1000 Things That Mat­ter web site and you’re inter­ested in shar­ing your stu­dents’ work with mine, post a com­ment here.

My Goals for 2009 (version 1.0)

I’ve noticed recently that there has been a lot of dis­cus­sion about New Year’s res­o­lu­tions. It’s that time of year, of course, but a new twist that I’ve seen is that many peo­ple are giv­ing up on the idea of res­o­lu­tions and shift­ing the focus to goal set­ting. I’d tend to agree with them. Res­o­lu­tions are absolute, and going in this direc­tion imme­di­ately sets one up for fail­ure. Goals, on the other had, can be adjusted as the cir­cum­stances change. They can also be open ended.

In con­sid­er­ing the goals I wanted to set for myself, I did a lit­tle research. 43things is a pop­u­lar web­site where peo­ple list and share their goals with each other and the world. Based on the things peo­ple had entered as of this post­ing, these are the top ten goals of all time at the site:

  1. lose weight 33286 peo­ple
  2. stop pro­cras­ti­nat­ing 24797 peo­ple
  3. write a book 23013 peo­ple
  4. Fall in love 22576 peo­ple
  5. be happy 19980 peo­ple
  6. Get a tat­too 18360 peo­ple
  7. drink more water 17204 peo­ple
  8. go on a road trip with no pre­de­ter­mined des­ti­na­tion 17071 peo­ple
  9. get mar­ried 16598 peo­ple
  10. travel the world 16577 peo­ple

I’m struck by two things as I look at this list. First, the goals are vague and very broad. Sec­ond, the list is sur­pris­ingly eclec­tic. I could prob­a­bly spend a lot of time try­ing to ana­lyze the fact that “Be happy” is right next to “Get a tat­too,” but I think I’ll leave that to the sociologists.

The research I did wasn’t much help to me. So I just spent some time brain­storm­ing about the things that mat­tered most to me, the things that I’m pas­sion­ate about, and that I felt God was guid­ing me to do, and came up with the first ver­sion of my goals for 2009. These are spe­cific, mea­sur­able, and all are intended to be com­pleted by the end of the year:

  • Read the entire Bible
  • Read 25 other books
  • Pub­lish an article
  • Write 250 blog posts
  • Write a new Inter­ac­tive Fic­tion game
  • Lose 30 pounds
  • Take a week long fam­ily vacation
  • Have a 3 day retreat with my wife

I read an arti­cle by Gene Dono­hue in which he wrote, “unless some­one is crit­i­cal to help­ing you achieve your goal(s), do not freely share your goals with oth­ers.” I have to dis­agree. I think that unless you are extremely self-​​disciplined (which I am not), shar­ing your goals is the only way to have any chance of fol­low­ing through on all of them. By dar­ing to share my goals pub­licly, I’m open­ing myself to the pos­si­bil­ity that any­one who reads this blog may ask me next week, next month, or later this year how I’m doing on one of them. And I’d bet­ter be pre­pared to answer. Just that knowl­edge will be moti­va­tion for me to not put this list aside and for­get about it after I’ve writ­ten it. That’s the power of social networking.

But don’t be sur­prised if you see ver­sion 1.1, 2.0, etc. as the year goes along, either!

1000 Things That Matter

When I saw the site 1000 Things That Mat­ter this morn­ing, my first thought was about what I’d post there. I decided to give it a cou­ple of days and pon­der what really mat­ters before putting in my two cents.

Then I con­sid­ered how I might use this with my gifted stu­dents. The obvi­ous appli­ca­tion would be to have stu­dents write ideas they’d post there. Noth­ing wrong with that, of course, and I could even have the stu­dents post their ideas to the site. But I want to stretch my gifted stu­dents, and I’m sure that if I just put this ques­tion to them as is, they’d choose the first things that came to their minds. I’d rather take them into higher lev­els of analy­sis and evaluation.

One of the inter­est­ing things about the site is that the things peo­ple are shar­ing are avail­able as they are posted. I think it would be rather enlight­en­ing to have stu­dents do a 3-​​phase process with this site:

  1. First, answer the ques­tion indi­vid­u­ally: If you had to tell what mat­ters to you in two sen­tences, what would you say?
  2. Then, look at a sam­pling (or per­haps all) of the ideas that have been shared already. Con­sider some of these questions:
    • What do you notice?
    • Are there any patterns?
    • Are there any com­mon themes that keep com­ing back?
    • Is there any­thing that seems to be missing?
    • Is there any­thing surprising?
    • What can you tell me about the peo­ple who are sub­mit­ting their ideas?
  3. Now look at what you wrote orig­i­nally. Would you change it? How? Why?

I encour­age you to try this process your­self and con­tribute a com­ment to the site. I’d also be inter­ested in what other ideas you have for using 1000 Things That Mat­ter with stu­dents. Share your ideas here in the comments.