Archive | Leadership RSS feed for this section

Not Just Change. Transformation.

Abandoned School, by Terence Faircloth, 8/7/06

Aban­doned School, by Ter­ence Fair­cloth, 8÷7÷08

Much has been writ­ten about the chang­ing needs of stu­dents in the 21st cen­tury and the trans­for­ma­tion that must take place in our schools to make it hap­pen. Sev­eral things are clear to me as I read them. First, it is going to take a vision­ary admin­is­tra­tion to remake the envi­ron­ment in which our schools oper­ate in order for those changes to be pos­si­ble. Sec­ond, like a mile-​​long freight train being switched onto another track, it will take a very long time for the needed changes to work their way down to the local level.

It took sev­eral years for No Child Left Behind to shift the focus of our schools from stu­dents to test scores, but that shift hap­pened. In the mean­time, the world shifted, too. What we really need now is No School Left Behind. Schools need to become more agile, more proac­tive, more will­ing to look ten or twenty years into the future instead of one or two.

If this web­site is any indi­ca­tion of the admin­is­tra­tion to come—one that not only lis­tens to its con­si­tu­tents, but actively invites their par­tic­i­pa­tion in the government—it has the nec­es­sary vision and deter­mi­na­tion. But even greater than this, it just under­scores how much dif­fer­ent a world tomorrow’s cit­i­zens will inhabit. We truly need to empower our stu­dents with the skills that &id=GDFeJnFlCfUC&dq=Optimizing+student+success+in+schools+with+the+other+three+R%27s:+Reasoning,+resilience,+and+responsibility&printsec=frontcover&source=web&ots=-IEU6TJngr&sig=K28Ul0XaC2mEw4wcP9iIUCSFdQc&sa=X&oi=book_result&resnum=1&ct=result" target="_blank">Robert Stern­berg calls the “other three R’s”: Rea­son­ing, Resilience, and Responsibility.

None of those are on the PSSA test. But they’re all on the real one: life.

I Want My District to Hire This Speaker

Kevin Jar­rett posted this arti­cle today and the title is absolutely on target:

Every. Edu­ca­tor. Must. Watch. This. NOW!

The video is amaz­ing and I plan to share it with a num­ber of admin­is­tra­tors and teach­ers in my dis­trict. Watch it. Now.

I find it inter­est­ing that as I was watch­ing it, though, I felt my cyn­i­cism ris­ing and had to fight off the urge to brush it off as ide­al­is­tic glurge while think­ing, “Yeah, well, this is just one kid. What about all the rest of them…?”

Some have com­mented that he is obvi­ously coached and deliv­er­ing a speech writ­ten by some­one else. So what? Many skilled moti­va­tional speak­ers do the same. In fact, a sim­i­lar scene (with a not-​​so-​​different goal, now that I think about it) is tak­ing place in Den­ver this week: a well-​​rehearsed, well-​​coached man will be giv­ing a speech writ­ten by some­one else which deliv­ers an impor­tant and inspi­ra­tional mes­sage to his audience.

I’m glad the cynic in me didn’t win. I hon­estly feel that if I can believe in my stu­dents and pro­fes­sional col­leagues the way Dal­ton believes in him­self and encour­ages his teach­ers to believe in him, any one of the stu­dents in my dis­trict could have been up there on that stage doing what he did. Any of them.

Now, all that’s left is to find a way to keep that atti­tude past the first week of school.…

Information Overload

Over the past week, I feel like I’ve dived head­first into the deep end of the pool, only to come up for air and dis­cover I’m actu­ally in the mid­dle of the Pacific.

About a month ago, I joined ISTE, and dis­cov­ered that they had an online pres­ence not just on the web, but also in Sec­ond Life. I signed up for a free account there and barely got into it, but quickly got lost and gave up. Last week, I decided to give Sec­ond Life a sec­ond shot, and jumped directly to the ISTE head­quar­ters there. I soon ran into a most friendly per­son there, Lyrah Lane (as she is known in SL), and we got chat­ting about school and edu­ca­tion, and it wasn’t long before I learned that ISTE was about to hold its annual con­ven­tion, the National Edu­ca­tional Com­put­ing Con­fer­ence (NECC) in San Anto­nio, Texas. Sev­eral other peo­ple I met in SL asked me, “Are you going to NECC? Are you going to be in San Anto­nio?” My response was always, “I wish!”

So I went through the week­end meet­ing peo­ple from all over the coun­try, get­ting to know each other, talk­ing about some of the pos­si­bil­i­ties of col­lab­o­rat­ing and net­work­ing with SL, and explor­ing a bit. I was con­stantly being given infor­ma­tion about places to visit in SL to meet other edu­ca­tors and get involved in col­lab­o­ra­tive projects and par­tic­i­pate in pro­fes­sional devel­op­ment and I couldn’t keep up with it all.

Just when I felt like I couldn’t han­dle any more and I needed to come up for air, I got a mes­sage on Mon­day from another one of my new SL friends and col­leagues, Pene­lope Drucker (again, not her real life name). She was co-​​presenter for a ses­sion at NECC which was going to take place both in real life and in Sec­ond Life. She needed a core group of SL par­tic­i­pants who were pre­pared to dis­cuss the topic because she had no way of know­ing who would be there either in San Anto­nio or in the SL venue. So in less than 24 hours, I needed to get up to speed on the National Edu­ca­tional Tech­nol­ogy Stan­dards for Admin­is­tra­tors (NETS-​​A). The panel dis­cus­sion was specif­i­cally to talk about how SL could strengthen and deep­eng the refresh process which would be revis­ing and updat­ing those stan­dards over the next year.

OK, I thought to myself, what am I going to be able to con­tribute to this dis­cus­sion? How am I, a “new­bie” to both ISTE and SL, going to have any­thing con­struc­tive to add to a con­ver­sa­tion about revis­ing the national tech­nol­ogy standards?

(As an aside, when I told my wife I was doing this panel dis­cus­sion in San Anto­nio, she nearly fainted—but that’s a story for another day.)

Once the meet­ing got going, though, the incred­i­ble power and pos­si­bil­i­ties of SL as a pro­fes­sional devel­op­ment medium began to open up for me. In the past, dis­cus­sions like this were highly exclu­sive: only peo­ple who were moti­vated and finan­cially able to travel around the coun­try were able to par­tic­i­pate in national con­fer­ences, and even then, these kinds of round­ta­bles were unlikely to be able to include many points of view from many dif­fer­ent peo­ple. Now, how­ever, even some­one like me who is “just” a teacher—someone with some valu­able expe­ri­ence and valid ideas, but who doesn’t have the cre­den­tials and con­nec­tions to mat­ter at the national level—can par­tic­i­pate on equal foot­ing with national lead­ers and have his voice con­tribute to the conversation.

Even more, SL now becomes not just a meet­ing place but an ongo­ing, per­ma­nent res­i­dence for us. The rela­tion­ships that were forged this week dur­ing NECC don’t end with the clos­ing keynote. We don’t shake hands as we check out of the hotel and say, “It was great to meet you, keep in touch, here’s my phone num­ber and my email address,” and then hope that there’s enough moti­va­tion to make the effort to write on a reg­u­lar basis. I know from expe­ri­ence that while email is a great tool for com­mu­ni­cat­ing and stay­ing in con­tact with peo­ple at a dis­tance, it is lousy for main­tain­ing dis­tance collaboration.

Peo­ple tend to col­lab­o­rate most with the peo­ple they run into on a daily basis, the ones with whom they work and play. I know for a fact that there are sev­eral peo­ple I met at NECC this week I will main­tain con­tact with, not just because I want to, but because I’m almost guar­an­teed to run into them on a fairly reg­u­lar basis in SL. It won’t take a con­scious effort on my part to remem­ber to email them—they’ll just be there, and we can have an ongo­ing con­ver­sa­tion about the projects we’re work­ing on, we can prob­lem solve together, share ideas, and socialize.

My pro­fes­sional cir­cle grew this week—by only a few peo­ple, granted, but I can tell already that some­thing pro­duc­tive will come from these relationships.

I’m head­ing into the week­end still totally over­whelmed with new infor­ma­tion to seek out, process, and absorb, with another large project to add to my sum­mer plan­ning list, but I’m not going into it alone. I have like-​​minded col­leagues in SL. We will bounce ideas off each other, brain­storm, debate, and gen­er­ate excit­ing new ways of teach­ing stu­dents and each other.

I’m over­whelmed, but I’m ener­gized about where this can go.

You Need a Committee for This?

This morn­ing I read an inter­est­ing arti­cle in the Wash­ing­ton Post about the play­ground poli­cies at a Vir­ginia ele­men­tary school. I was a lit­tle sur­prised at my reac­tion: I wasn’t shocked that this happens—I’ve seen sim­i­lar things first hand. As the head of our school safety com­mit­tee, I know the kind of think­ing that can lead up to this, and I under­stand the mind­set that can bring you to a point where you need to con­sider ban­ning an activ­ity like tag at recess.

I don’t nec­es­sar­ily agree with the decision—I think it was prob­a­bly tak­ing things too far, and with­out know­ing all the details, I sus­pect there were other ways to deal with what­ever prob­lems might have been going on. I also know from expe­ri­ence that this kind of prob­lem is gen­er­ally a symp­tom of some­thing deeper (per­haps poor super­vi­sion on the play­ground, or some­thing rooted in the school or com­mu­nity cul­ture that was get­ting expressed in the kids’ play at recess). Ban­ning a play­ground game seems to me like fix­ing a mildew prob­lem in your bath­room by not tak­ing any more showers.

What did sur­prise me, though, was this:

Now, a com­mit­tee of admin­is­tra­tors and teach­ers has devised a plan to rein­state the game. After a week of “reori­en­ta­tion lessons on play­ground safety” in phys­i­cal edu­ca­tion classes, class­room dis­cus­sions of safe recess behav­ior and mon­i­tor­ing by teach­ers on the black­top, stu­dents are likely to be yelling “You’re it!” by tomorrow.

It really took a com­mit­tee (of admin­is­tra­tors and teach­ers, no less) to devise this plan? They had to develop a week’s worth of “reori­en­ta­tion lessons”?

Chil­dren need unstruc­tured play time, and this is one of the pur­poses for hav­ing recess in the first place. They also need ade­quate super­vi­sion. The focus of this entire plan was on what was “wrong” with the chil­dren. What about the adults who were respon­si­ble for mon­i­tor­ing the kids’ play? What about the par­ents who have the respon­si­bil­ity to instill char­ac­ter val­ues in their chil­dren? Where is this kind of approach to school safety likely to take us in the next few years?