Archive | Technology RSS feed for this section

Why "I Don't Do Technology" Isn't Acceptable

The FAA Credit Union building which stands in for the Crime Lab in CSI: Miami.

Imag­ine an episode of CSI where the main char­ac­ter doesn’t “do” tech­nol­ogy:

Tonight, on CSI: Miami, Hor­a­tio Caine inves­ti­gates a bru­tal crime wave using only his wits and his sun­glasses. He matches fin­ger­prints, tire tracks, and fiber samples…by hand! His new motto: ‘DNA? We don’t need no stink­ing DNA! Sher­lock Holmes got by with a mag­ni­fy­ing glass and a deer­stalker! Why do I need technology?’”


Imag­ine the con­ver­sa­tion you have with your doc­tor when he diag­nosed you with can­cer after a brief exam­i­na­tion.

Aren’t you going to run some tests? Do a CT scan?” you ask.

No, I’m really not com­fort­able with tech­nol­ogy. I man­age just fine with­out it.”


Ridicu­lous, no? Then why do we tol­er­ate sim­i­lar com­ments from educators?

Argu­ments go around and come back again about the role tech­nol­ogy should play in the class­room. Should it be a sub­ject? Should we have stan­dards? Should it be man­dated or optional? Some peo­ple argue that tech­nol­ogy is sim­ply a tool to be applied where and how it’s appro­pri­ate. Oth­ers say no tech­nol­ogy is neu­tral and we have to be delib­er­ate in our choices to use it.

In my view, tech­nol­ogy can’t be optional and it can’t be an add-​​on.

Tech­nol­ogy, accord­ing to my favorite dic­tio­nary, is “the prac­ti­cal appli­ca­tion of knowl­edge” or “a capa­bil­ity given by the prac­ti­cal appli­ca­tion of knowl­edge.” For an edu­ca­tor to say he or she doesn’t “do” that seems a lit­tle silly.

Of course when we talk about “tech­nol­ogy in the class­room” we’re usu­ally being a bit more spe­cific and refer­ring to dig­i­tal tech­nol­ogy. Even so, I think it should be unavoidable.

Every­thing that we can do using dig­i­tal tech­nol­ogy can cer­tainly be done in some other way. As I under­stand it, tech­nol­ogy gives us three capa­bil­i­ties: to do things

  • More effi­ciently
  • More pre­cisely
  • More thor­oughly

Tech­nol­ogy advances give all of us—doctors, foren­sic sci­en­tists, teach­ers, and students—the abil­ity to make bet­ter deci­sions and solve more com­plex prob­lems. Do we have the right to say, “I don’t do that”? Per­haps if it were only an indi­vid­ual deci­sion. But edu­ca­tors have accepted respon­si­bil­ity for the growth of the stu­dents in their care, and choos­ing to avoid tech­nol­ogy for them­selves leaves their stu­dents with no choice.

So what am I miss­ing? Where has my logic taken a left turn? How does this play out in your situation?

ISTE 2010: Emerging Themes

Two themes are emerg­ing in what I’m learn­ing here at ISTE 2010. These aren’t new ideas by any stretch, even to me. It’s just that they are being dri­ven home in very pow­er­ful and deep ways.

The world is small and flat. Not pre­cisely in the sense that Thomas Fried­man meant in his book, but in the sense of con­nec­tions and rela­tion­ships. As I said yes­ter­day, I can hardly turn around any­where with­out see­ing some­one I know, or meet­ing some­one I’ve con­versed with on Twit­ter. Today I met Jeff Aga­menoni and Sue Waters, from Mon­tana and Aus­tralia respec­tively, and with whom I have chat­ted many times over the last cou­ple of years. (Sue, of course, reminded me almost imme­di­ately that I for­got to bring her the choco­late I promised her. And then I took her seat in the Blogger’s Cafe. Great way to treat some­one I’ve just met.)

When our stu­dents leave our schools, they are going to land in a world where they need to relate not just with peo­ple who live and work near them, but with peo­ple around the world. It’s not optional any more. Every­one is your neigh­bor. Dis­tance is now mea­sured not in miles but by your abil­ity to con­nect with dif­fer­ent chan­nels. The more com­mu­ni­ca­tion tools you know, the closer you are. Kids are going to have to be able to find peo­ple and be found, to build their own dig­i­tal homes and tell their own dig­i­tal stories.

Which is the sec­ond theme I’m see­ing over and over:

Design is an essen­tial skill. Garr Reynolds in his book and blog, Pre­sen­ta­tion Zen, talks about how often peo­ple treat design as an after­thought, as though it’s dec­o­ra­tion to be painted on after mak­ing the con­tent. But design is much deeper. It is ulti­mately about effec­tive com­mu­ni­ca­tion and facil­i­tat­ing con­nec­tion. If a valu­able mes­sage is obscured by poor design, the mes­sage will lose power, or the recip­i­ent will give up before it gets through.

Just as kids have to learn how to con­nect with the world and man­age those con­nec­tions, they have to learn how to effec­tively use the prin­ci­ples and tools of design to enhance their com­mu­ni­ca­tion. The only way we will ever be able to teach those skills is to use them ourselves.

So my first take­away from the day is that all edu­ca­tors, not just the ones who like that “tech­nol­ogy stuff,” have to become con­nected and become design­ers. It’s not optional any­more, because we will be putting our kids at a dis­ad­van­tage if we don’t get there.

ISTE 2010: Day 1

So here I am, sit­ting in the Blogger’s Cafe at the ISTE Con­fer­ence, a place that until now has existed only in myth and leg­end. This is, depend­ing on how you count it, either my first or my third ISTE. Two years ago, I attended NECC 2008, but only vir­tu­ally, through the activ­i­ties at ISTE Island in Sec­ond Life. I met many peo­ple there, and blogged about my expe­ri­ence. Last year, I did the same, again meet­ing new peo­ple, build­ing my net­work of col­leagues, and grow­ing my inter­est in attend­ing in person.

So this, year I’m at ISTE for the third year in a row, but this time in per­son. And as I tend to do, I didn’t do this halfway: not only am I attend­ing my first ISTE, but I orga­nized a Tweetup ear­lier this morn­ing, I’m vol­un­teer­ing at the Infor­ma­tion Booth in about an hour, and I’m pre­sent­ing a model les­son on Tues­day.

I have attended pro­fes­sional con­fer­ences before, some­times with other col­leagues from my dis­trict and some­times on my own. In some ways, this is much like the annual con­fer­ence of any other large, inter­na­tional orga­ni­za­tion: there are thou­sands of atten­dees (I over­heard one per­son esti­mate it at 20,000), a huge exhibitor floor of cor­po­ra­tions want­ing us to buy their prod­ucts, a book­store, keynotes, work­shops, and so on.

But I think what defines ISTE for me, and what sets it way apart from the other con­fer­ences I’ve been to, is that this is all about con­nec­tions. I walked into the Den­ver Con­ven­tion Cen­ter this morn­ing, and ran into Scott Mer­rick, some­one I’ve known for two years online, but never met in per­son until today. Although I am a lit­tle intim­i­dated by the enor­mity of the site and the num­ber of peo­ple here, it was imme­di­ately com­fort­able, because I knew that I already know dozens of peo­ple. I’ve run into many of them, and I’m very likely to run into more as the week goes on.

This con­fer­ence, then, isn’t a one-​​shot event where I will be immersed in indi­vid­ual learn­ing for a few days and then go back to “real­ity” where I can only hope to apply a few things that may have been absorbed while the rest evap­o­rate like the fad­ing shreds of an inter­rupted dream. This con­fer­ence feels to me much more like an intense con­cen­tra­tion of the rela­tion­ships and con­ver­sa­tions that hap­pen on a daily and weekly basis with the net­work of pro­fes­sional col­leagues that I’ve been build­ing over the last two years through Twit­ter, blog­ging, and Sec­ond Life.

Every moment of my time here so far has involved learn­ing. Even at din­ner last night, the con­ver­sa­tion turned to some deep philo­soph­i­cal dis­cus­sions about the nature of learning.

On its sur­face, ISTE is a tech­nol­ogy con­fer­ence. At its root, though, are not hard­ware and soft­ware and ven­dors and books. This con­fer­ence is really about pro­fes­sional edu­ca­tors who care deeply about learn­ing and stu­dents and max­i­miz­ing potential.

Tomor­row I begin attend­ing the for­mal ses­sions. I expect to learn more than I can process, and will be blog­ging about my expe­ri­ences. I also expect to learn just as much from the infor­mal gath­er­ings, the hall­way con­ver­sa­tions, the din­ner mee­tups, and the other amaz­ing peo­ple I will meet. What I hope to bring back to my dis­trict is a renewed enthu­si­asm for cre­at­ing an awe­some envi­ron­ment in our schools for stu­dents to learn and thrive, and ideas about how to intro­duce my work col­leagues to the power of this net­work I have discovered.

Tech Tools: Student Blogging

Student blogging
Image by Ing­wii via Flickr

Let me just say up front that I know I’m &submit=Search" target="_blank">hardly the first per­son to address this topic, and I’m sure I won’t be the last. In fact, so much has already been writ­ten on the sub­ject of stu­dent blog­ging that I’m not going to spend time here talk­ing about the basic rea­sons or the how-​​tos of doing it. Oth­ers have done that bet­ter than I.

What I want to explore today are a few of my thoughts about why blog­ging is a par­tic­u­larly pow­er­ful tool to give to gifted stu­dents. Gifted stu­dents have some unique needs that blog­ging can help teach­ers to address. Read More…

Tech Tools: Interactive Fiction

Screenshot of Zork in 1980
Image by the-​​tml via Flickr

Though it has taken me much longer than I planned to get back to this topic, I want to share with you today what I believe is an out­stand­ing and prob­a­bly very obscure tool that would be excel­lent for gifted students.

Think back a few years. No, fur­ther back. A lit­tle fur­ther. When home com­put­ers had mem­ory mea­sured in kilo­bytes, an 8-​​color mon­i­tor was high res­o­lu­tion, and disks were floppy.

The cutting-​​edge trend in com­puter enter­tain­ment was some­thing called a “text adven­ture game.” Zork is the clas­sic exam­ple of games in this genre, but there were dozens of them. They had no graph­ics and no need for a con­troller, because the entire means of inter­act­ing with the game was through text.

For those who have never played a text adven­ture, here is a typ­i­cal sequence of moves you might see in one of these games (this is part of the sam­ple tran­script that was in the instruc­tion man­ual for the orig­i­nal Zork): Read More…

Better Tools or Better Teaching?

Ted Williams
Image by GregPC via Flickr

It’s a line you’ve prob­a­bly seen on ads for sports equip­ment:

Bet­ter Tools for Bet­ter Performance


A debate is swirling among many peo­ple in my PLN about what’s more impor­tant: the tools and tech­nol­ogy, or the teach­ing and learning. Before I begin explor­ing exam­ples of great tech­nol­ogy tools to use with gifted stu­dents, I thought it would be worth explor­ing, since it is directly rel­e­vant. The crux of it can be sum­ma­rized in this exchange I had recently with Tony Bal­dasaro (@baldy7) on Twit­ter: Read More…

Best Tech Tools for Gifted Students

Banana slicer
Image by Dave Makes via Flickr

First a dis­claimer: If you read that title and thought, “Oh cool, another list of [sites/​games/​activities] I can plug into my [instruction/​centers/​homework/​busywork] to keep my gifted kids [challenged/​engaged/​occupied/​from bug­ging me],” then this is not the post you were look­ing for.

Read More…

Glogster: A Unique Creative Tool

Glogster logo

Ear­lier this sum­mer I was intro­duced to the edu­ca­tional ver­sion of Glog­ster. For those not famil­iar with the site, Glog­ster is mar­keted as a sort of graphic blog (the site’s tagline is “Poster Your­self”). It has some inter­est­ing fea­tures that also make it a unique tool for stu­dent work. The edu­ca­tion ver­sion allows teach­ers to reg­is­ter up to 200 stu­dent accounts which are all con­nected to each other in a class. Stu­dents can then cre­ate an unlim­ited num­ber of glogs, each of which is a one-​​page inter­ac­tive poster.

Glog cre­ators can embed text, clip art, pho­tos, video, and sound on each page. Each object can also have a live link attached to it. The pages can also be embed­ded into other loca­tions such as blogs and wiki sites (see my class­room wiki as an exam­ple of this). The embed­ded glog is live, so any changes that are made to it at the Glog­ster site appear imme­di­ately wher­ever else you embed it.

So besides “pos­ter­ing them­selves,” what could stu­dents do with Glog­ster? Here are a few ideas. I’m sure these will get you think­ing about others—please share your own ideas in the comments.

  1. Cre­at­ing a “Choose Your Own Adven­ture” graphic novel. Each page would be a scene from the story with cer­tain click­able ele­ments that would take the viewer to a new page which con­tin­ues the story.
  2. Build a per­sonal port­fo­lio, show­cas­ing links to scanned work, uploaded files, and online work such as blog posts and web sites.
  3. Cre­ate a visual glos­sary for a unit or subject.
  4. Write an inter­ac­tive, visual book review or char­ac­ter study.
  5. Make a click­able dia­gram to illus­trate a con­cept or model a process. Links would take the user to a def­i­n­i­tion, expla­na­tion, or a closer view of that por­tion of the model.
  6. Mock up a web site home page.
  7. Develop an inter­ac­tive mag­a­zine or newslet­ter. Each page could rep­re­sent a depart­ment, fea­ture, or activ­ity and include pic­tures, video, and text link­ing to sto­ries in a blog or other online publication.
  8. Invent a game or puz­zle which includes video, image, sound, and text ele­ments and requires the play­ers to inter­act with them to move.
  9. Assem­ble an inter­ac­tive exhibit illus­trat­ing an event or era of his­tory in pic­tures and video.
  10. Make a talk­ing sto­ry­book for chil­dren using clips of nar­ra­tion and sound effects attached to pages and images.

Truly cre­ative stu­dents will cer­tainly be able to come up with many more ways of using the site, so let them loose and see what they can do.

Kitchen Sink Link Buckets

The kitchen sink
Image by alancleaver_​2000 via Flickr

I had a con­ver­sa­tion the other day with Kelly Hines on Twit­ter about resources for teach­ers. There are a num­ber of sites out there (like this one and this one) that col­lect links to resources for teach­ers in one place for easy ref­er­ence. Some peo­ple find them use­ful, and there are undoubt­edly some great resources there.

But I tend to find them dif­fi­cult to use, at best. Though they fre­quently are cat­e­go­rized by topic, or grade level, or some other sys­tem, in prac­tice, it is sort of like hand­ing some­one a list of all the book titles in the library. I think these kinds of kitchen sink link buck­ets have value, and I’m not say­ing there’s no point in hav­ing them or using them. I just per­son­ally find their value to be lim­ited. For some­one who plans around resources, they are, I’m sure, invalu­able. Browse the list, gather a few good sites, and then build your instruc­tion around them.

But I tend to plan in the oppo­site direc­tion. I’ll select my objec­tives and projects and develop a gen­eral out­line of where I want to go, then look for resources that will plug into the out­line. Link buck­ets are not the best way to track down this sort of resource.

Prob­lem is, I’m not sure what really would work. I’m a mem­ber of Diigo and Deli­cious and do search through the socially tagged links there. I do use the link buck­ets from time to time. But what I think we need is some­thing that’s a blend of a wiki and a social book­mark­ing site. The prob­lem I see with cur­rent social book­mark­ing is that each person’s links are sep­a­rate. When I search, I get an uncat­e­go­rized, unsorted list of links which may well con­tain dupli­cates. I can see if mul­ti­ple peo­ple have saved the same link, but a dif­fer­ent link on the same domain will show up as a sep­a­rate item.

Here are a few fea­tures (in absolutely no par­tic­u­lar order) I’d ide­ally like to see in the per­fect resource site:

  • Search within search results to nar­row the focus
  • Group­ing and sort­ing within results
  • If I save a link, I will imme­di­ately see who else has saved the same page or domain so I can make an intel­li­gent deci­sion about how to save the link
  • A way to dis­play anno­tated links (not just titles or sum­maries) for a par­tic­u­lar tag or search term
  • A broad but struc­tured way of iden­ti­fy­ing links as appro­pri­ate for var­i­ous cat­e­gories (e.g. K-​​2, math, geol­ogy, etc.)
  • A way of edit­ing the cat­e­go­riza­tion made by oth­ers and mod­i­fy­ing the struc­ture itself (like a wiki)

There has to be some way of bal­anc­ing vol­ume (lots of worth­while links) with find­abil­ity (lim­it­ing links to a few strong can­di­dates so it is more brows­able, like this list I put together for a work­shop I did recently).

What am I miss­ing? What other fea­tures should it have? How would it look in prac­tice? Is this even a pos­si­bil­ity? Maybe it already exists and I just don’t know it yet. I’d love to hear what other peo­ple have to say.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Lessons in Responsibility from Spider-Man, Part 3

Wordle: Leadership Day: The Pace of Change
Lead­er­ship Day: The Pace of Change, from Prac­ti­cal The­ory by Chris Lehmann

In my last two posts, I wrote about the respon­si­bil­i­ties that go along with using pow­er­ful tech­nol­ogy tools, both for stu­dents and for teach­ers. Today I will con­sider a third group: administrators.

The Inter­na­tional Soci­ety for Tech­nol­ogy in Edu­ca­tion (ISTE) rec­og­nizes the impor­tance of strong lead­er­ship to the effec­tive use of tech­nol­ogy in schools, shown by the fact that they have devel­oped national stan­dards for admin­is­tra­tors. It is not enough to sim­ply cre­ate poli­cies aimed at enforc­ing safety and pro­duc­tiv­ity for stu­dents and teach­ers. Admin­is­tra­tors must accept their respon­si­bil­ity for vision­ary lead­er­ship, which takes sev­eral forms.

Understand

Just as teach­ers and stu­dents must under­stand a new tool or tech­nique before they can use it prop­erly, admin­is­tra­tors must deeply under­stand what is hap­pen­ing in the realm of tech­nol­ogy if they are going to be able to lead effec­tively. This means learn­ing about research and best practices.

It also requires them to use the tech­nolo­gies them­selves. Con­sider what a “chalk­board pol­icy” might have looked like if designed by admin­is­tra­tors who had never used one:

  1. Chalk­boards by nature are open and acces­si­ble forums, and as such have inher­ent risks involved with their use. In the best inter­ests of stu­dent and employee safety, it is the pol­icy of this admin­is­tra­tion to restrict access to chalk­boards and to mon­i­tor their use at all times.
  2. Chalk­boards will be main­tained behind a locked panel when not in use. The key to this panel is avail­able in the main office of each school build­ing and must be signed out when needed.
  3. Only autho­rized brands of yel­low or white chalk may be used on Dis­trict chalk­boards. Other writ­ing imple­ments, includ­ing but not lim­ited to col­ored chalk, serve no dis­cernible edu­ca­tional pur­pose and are forbidden.
  4. Only those who have a signed “Chalk­board User Agree­ment” on file may write on the chalk­board at any time.
  5. The use of the chalk­board is a priv­i­lege, which may be revoked by the admin­is­tra­tors at any time for abu­sive con­duct or vio­la­tions of this agreement.


Of course, there are many places where the par­al­lels break down, and it is not my intent to make light of the real issues and risks involved with Inter­net use by stu­dents. I believe, how­ever, that if more admin­is­tra­tors had a thor­ough under­stand­ing of the tools affected by their poli­cies, those poli­cies would have a dif­fer­ent focus.

Plan

Many dis­tricts seem to think that the prin­ci­ple of reverse psychology–where doing the oppo­site of what is expected will have more pow­er­ful results–also applies to pol­icy imple­men­ta­tion in this three-​​step process:

  1. Imple­ment new policy
  2. Deter­mine how the pol­icy should work (usu­ally after 6–12 months of practice)
  3. Decide whether the pol­icy was war­ranted in the first place (often after a year or two of failure)

In real­ity there must be thor­ough plan­ning before a pol­icy can be put into effect, with con­sid­er­a­tion for how it will impact all areas of cur­ricu­lum and instruction.

Another, more sub­tle sort of plan­ning is required if the use of tech­nol­ogy tools is going to be any­thing other than just a tacked-​​on option to an already over­stuffed cur­ricu­lum. This is where a clear, long-​​range vision for the future is cru­cial. The higher in an orga­ni­za­tion an admin­is­tra­tor rises, the more that per­son needs to see the big pic­ture and proac­tively design, not man­age, what that pic­ture will look like as the dis­trict develops.

Model

Edu­ca­tors know that more pow­er­ful than telling is show­ing. Good teach­ers build mod­el­ing into their instruc­tion because it pro­vides stu­dents with an exam­ple of what skilled, expert use looks like.

Admin­is­tra­tors can­not expect teach­ers and stu­dents to sim­ply fol­low their vision with hav­ing an exam­ple to fol­low. If admin­is­tra­tors expect tech­nol­ogy tools to be used prop­erly, they must show what that proper use looks like. If they want to see more stu­dents and teach­ers blog­ging, they must blog. If they want to see Twit­ter used as a pro­fes­sional tool rather than sim­ply a social one, they must be on Twit­ter themselves.

Communicate

A clear, effec­tive vision will never become real­ity until it is com­mu­ni­cated with those who are ulti­mately required to put it into effect. Just as teach­ers must com­mu­ni­cate with stu­dents, giv­ing feed­back, shar­ing goals, set­ting expec­ta­tions, admin­is­tra­tors must com­mu­ni­cate in all the same ways with their constituents.

Conclusion

Imple­ment­ing tech­nol­ogy respon­si­bly and effec­tively is a com­plex thing. Because it has so much power, I believe it would be irre­spon­si­ble not to embrace these tools in schools today. Many stu­dents, teach­ers, and admin­is­tra­tors are under­stand­ably reluc­tant to take on the respon­si­bil­i­ties that come along with the power of the tools. But like Peter Parker, who received his pow­ers with­out ask­ing for them, we can­not ignore them. We have to dive in, accept the fact that we have been handed great respon­si­bil­i­ties, and use our pow­ers to become super­heros instead of villains.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]